Have photojournalism employees been replaced?

[Davey]

It seems to me that print media has replaced their usual photojournalism staff with freelance photographers and videographers. Is anyone still hiring in-house professionals?

 

[Paul Stevens]

I think most of the photographers that work for the paper also earn income through other avenues. Unless a photojournalist is placed with a military unit overseas, I can't see them earning a steady salary and benefits.

 

[PictureHub]

Would we say that it is more convenient and cost-effective than hiring in-house professionals? As Paul Stevens says, freelancing allows a photojournalist to handle several jobs simultaneously, hence the possibility to earn more.

 

[Vivid]

Does it apply to all print media companies or those with the financial muscle? Hiring freelancers may not be cheaper than having in-house staff. There are instances when both categories of professionals exist in an organization.

 

[Mentee]

Larger news agencies would probably not rely too much on freelancers to maintain a certain standard. Photojournalism aims to deliver a message, and some organizations like their employees to have the same values.